Can one pilot plan satisfy the panel?
Three interviewers want to know whether Mina can launch the same pilot.
The question
Mina interviews for an operations role at fictional Alder Services. The commercial lead wants customer coverage. Engineering asks whether the work fits. The people lead asks how the plan affects the owner’s workload.
| Amount | |
|---|---|
| Cases proposed | 60 |
| Minutes per case | 12 |
| Trained owner’s available hours | 12 |
One trained owner handles the pilot. Use the weekly figures for the same period.
“Choose what you would say to the panel.”
Not saved by this site. Your browser may restore text when you navigate back.
A strong answer, step by step
Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.
Step 1: What decision do they share?
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Give one conditional recommendation
The strong move. The same capacity condition applies to every interviewer.
Promise the launch to commercial and leave staffing for the people lead
Tempting, but it misses something. The commercial commitment would depend on a staffing answer the panel has yet to confirm.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I would start with a pilot if the handling work fits the owner’s capacity. I’ll check that before promising sixty places.”
Why it works: The same capacity condition applies to every interviewer.
Step 2: Does the plan fit?
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Report a fit with zero spare hours
The strong move. Demand equals capacity. Any additional work would require a change.
Say the owner has room for more cases
Tempting, but it misses something. The plan uses the full twelve hours.
Divide sixty cases by twelve minutes to get five hours
Tempting, but it misses something. Multiply cases by minutes per case to get total minutes.
See how a strong candidate says it
“Sixty cases at twelve minutes each take 720 minutes, or 12 hours. That uses all the owner’s time.”
Why it works: Demand equals capacity. Any additional work would require a change.
Step 3: What can the owner handle now?
The people lead says the owner must spend 2 hours per week training colleagues. Those hours come out of the same twelve-hour allocation.
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Reduce the cap to 50 or secure more capacity
The strong move. The training time reduces available capacity by two hours and the case cap by ten.
Keep sixty by assuming each case will take less time
Tempting, but it misses something. The panel has provided no faster handling time.
See how a strong candidate says it
“Training leaves 10 handling hours. That is 600 minutes, so the cap is 50 cases at twelve minutes each.”
Why it works: The training time reduces available capacity by two hours and the case cap by ten.
Step 4: What should everyone hear?
The commercial lead says all 60 places were already mentioned to clients.
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Explain the ten-place gap and name the next action
The strong move. The panel needs the same revised commitment and a named next action.
Keep sixty in the client message and fifty in the staffing plan
Tempting, but it misses something. The client promise and the plan would describe different capacity.
See how a strong candidate says it
“We can handle fifty cases under the new staffing assumption. Ask the commercial lead to revise the client message or secure the two extra hours before confirming sixty.”
Why it works: The panel needs the same revised commitment and a named next action.
The answer, in short
- Decision
- Offer at most 50 places with the current staffing.
- Because
- Training leaves ten hours for handling.
- What would change it
- Two more trained handling hours would cover all sixty cases.
Common traps
- Use the same weekly period for demand and capacity.
- A client message does not add staffing.
Check your answer
- I gave one conditional answer.
- I checked spare capacity.
- I revised the cap when staffing changed.
- I gave every interviewer the same commitment.
Last reviewed Nov 10, 2026